|
Web design and Programming Discuss website creation and other programming topics. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
||
|
for those who do remember me...
so yeah, this happens a lot... i get really busy and forget to visit novahq... well shucks...
anyway, i seem to have a problem with a gap under the header of my design... http://www.connerband.com/seventhspectrum/index2.html can anyone help? thanks in advance, 7
__________________
^ i cant spell... bower should be bauer... hell with it... Originally posted by blueprint If you weren't so great in bed I'd have to say that's ripping. |
#2
|
||
|
hey, your back
very very nice template
__________________
|
#3
|
||
|
ha, thanks lucky...
anyone else know how to fix it? i'm a little rusty on my html
__________________
^ i cant spell... bower should be bauer... hell with it... Originally posted by blueprint If you weren't so great in bed I'd have to say that's ripping. |
#4
|
||
|
On, closer examination, theres no gap for me
__________________
|
#5
|
||
|
are you running firebox or IE?
__________________
^ i cant spell... bower should be bauer... hell with it... Originally posted by blueprint If you weren't so great in bed I'd have to say that's ripping. |
#6
|
||
|
the fox
__________________
|
#7
|
||
|
the size look smaller then other site i been to.
sorry don't have asker maybe scott can see it right off the back. my screen size is 1024x768 the area look around 500x??? is size real small
__________________
* altnews sources [getmo & others news] not found main FNN: realrawnews.com *Discord: Unknown77#7121 Playing now days: EA Games> swtor [star wars old republic] |
#8
|
||
|
the lines on both sides of the middle section, along with the middle section are not touching the header like they are supposed to. yeah, the area is 500x475, it is small, but i like it. and im running on 1280x1024...
everything is pretty much in 3 rows and 3 columns of tables, but not the footer. the problem is that the top row table (where the header is at) has a space below the images, when it's not supposed to do that. it is a problem in IE, havent tested it in firefox yet.... anyone follow? 7
__________________
^ i cant spell... bower should be bauer... hell with it... Originally posted by blueprint If you weren't so great in bed I'd have to say that's ripping. |
#9
|
||
|
ok... so yeah, it works fine in firefox...
dammit bill gates...
__________________
^ i cant spell... bower should be bauer... hell with it... Originally posted by blueprint If you weren't so great in bed I'd have to say that's ripping. |
#10
|
||
|
The slicing was the problem..
Feeling generous today so I fixed your slices and it works fine now dl attachment:
__________________
04' Dodge SRT-4, Mopar Stage 3, 406whp/436wtq |
#11
|
||
|
i had just done it too... ugh.. i'm never going to be nice again
__________________
|
#12
|
||
|
I would suggest doing it in CSS and divs rather though, usually pose less problems with different browsers. Even if it was the slice this time
|
#13
|
||
|
clean html will never pose a problem between browsers (in my exp).. css is where all the browser problems are, since they both have diffrent css standards.
__________________
04' Dodge SRT-4, Mopar Stage 3, 406whp/436wtq |
#14
|
||
|
I've experienced the compleet oposite.
|
#15
|
||
|
cant seem to open the rar.... once again... Dammit Bill Gates
__________________
^ i cant spell... bower should be bauer... hell with it... Originally posted by blueprint If you weren't so great in bed I'd have to say that's ripping. |
#16
|
||
|
You need winrar.. http://www.rarlabs.com.. very small and efficient program
__________________
04' Dodge SRT-4, Mopar Stage 3, 406whp/436wtq |
#17
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
#18
|
||
|
thanks scott it works... but why was it a problem?
__________________
^ i cant spell... bower should be bauer... hell with it... Originally posted by blueprint If you weren't so great in bed I'd have to say that's ripping. |
#19
|
||
|
CSS and XHTML works the best, however clean html can work as well too. I think it just depends on what you are more fluent in. They both have different advantages. CSS and XHTML can work better w/ cell phones and can load faster. It is also better for making the web more accesible. Clean HTML on the other hand is more known, and can save lots of time (in my case) coding. I'm faster coding HTML than I am coding CSS and XHTML strict. But really it's whatever you choose works best for you. (haha i always like to get into this little argue ment of which is better. I personaly can't say which I like more).
Anyways nice template se7en. nice to see you here again |
#20
|
||
|
thanks jonM
__________________
^ i cant spell... bower should be bauer... hell with it... Originally posted by blueprint If you weren't so great in bed I'd have to say that's ripping. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone Remember Me? | MSgt.Dylan | General Chat | 5 | 05-30-2009 07:55 AM |
remember ,remember. | Mauser 98K | General Chat | 4 | 11-06-2007 08:43 PM |
Who remember | Chels | General Chat | 4 | 12-21-2006 01:34 AM |
Remember? | Chels | General Chat | 23 | 02-10-2006 03:05 PM |
DO YOU REMEMBER THESE? | Desciple | Sigs and Graphics | 3 | 12-18-2002 01:54 PM |