It Sucks And It's Getting Worse

Amen Bullet...nicely said bro

[Dr. Bullet]

You know what's interesting about the Bill of Rights? We don't even need it! In Federalist Paper 84, Alexander Hamilton says that there is no need for a bill of rights, because, for instance, the Constitution does not give our government the power to take away any freedom of speech. It doesn't give the power to take away our guns. So really, our Bill of Rights is there so there is no confusion as to where we stand on certain issues. I think our legislators need to be reminded of this.

If anyone even thinks they know anything about the Constitution, I encourage you to read the Federalist Papers. They were written by men who wrote the Constitution, and give a ton of insight as to what certain areas in the Constitution mean, and much more. Entire college classes are devoted to this book. You can see it here: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...books&n=507846

In my opinion, it is the most important book for an American, second only to the Bible.

[Dr. Bullet]

Here's an excerpt from the Federalist Papers:

I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do? Why, for instance, should it be said that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed?

The full collection of papers can be found at: http://www.law.ou.edu/hist/federalist/

Go Sooners

Your interlecutal insight on this bullet amazes me. Cheers.

[KU43]

Good sight Dr. Bullet. Also clinton held up his gun ban until china delivered it's last shipment of norinco and polytect firearms. China was so sure he would do it the shipment was already 1/2 way here when clinton gave it his o.k.clinton was always out spocken when it came to firearms but you didn't hear a word out of him when polytect got caught trying to bring 2000 full-auto aks into the country by way of a port in Oakland California. They say someone very high in the government had to have tipped off polytect because all the big boys made it out of the U.S. by the skin of their teeth.

[Dr. Bullet]

Thanks guys

Amazing huh?

[KU43]

Has anyone heared of the triladeral comission, or club rome? "give me control of a countrys money and i care not who makes the laws" THE UN PLAN The world will disband all national armys.All troops will be under UN control. The world will be divided into 64 sectors.The ruler of each sector will not be a native to that area The UN troops in the sector will also not be natived to the area. This will keep the people from rallying around their troops in rebellion.The 64 sector leaders will anwser to only one man. I have a copy of this US document and as soon as i can find it Ill give more details. the doctron is from the 1960's

[Hellfighter]

Originally posted by KU43
Has anyone heard of the triladeral commission, or club Rome? "give me control of a country's money and i care not who makes the laws" THE UN PLAN The world will disband all national army's.All troops will be under UN control. The world will be divided into 64 sectors.The ruler of each sector will not be a native to that area The UN troops in the sector will also not be natives to the area. This will keep the people from rallying around their troops in rebellion.The 64 sector leaders will answer to only one man. I have a copy of this US document and as soon as i can find it Ill give more details. the doctron is from the 1960's

yea i heard of it the USA don't what no part of it. darn Clinton was going for it but it was put to a stop, we are not going to let the UN take contour of the US-Arm Forces at all.

i really think it a fool game they are trying to do.
would not last long.
===========================================
as for the money will they are trying to copy the USA we have 51 states all the same money, some could say each state is a smaller country that is part of a larger government. the USA been doing it over now 200yrs now. think the UN like to see it go one step Be-on that world wide.
===========================================
the UN can not be trusted seem they are taking Dirty money into their pockets, they need to be fire (change of heads in it) then maybe it has a better chance don't see it with the people they have in it at this time.

[SilentTrigger]

Originally posted by KU43
Has anyone heared of the triladeral comission, or club rome? "give me control of a countrys money and i care not who makes the laws" THE UN PLAN The world will disband all national armys.All troops will be under UN control. The world will be divided into 64 sectors.The ruler of each sector will not be a native to that area The UN troops in the sector will also not be natived to the area. This will keep the people from rallying around their troops in rebellion.The 64 sector leaders will anwser to only one man. I have a copy of this US document and as soon as i can find it Ill give more details. the doctron is from the 1960's

Lmao, thanks for charing your fantasies

UN isn't against national defence

[Dr. Bullet]

We need to drop the UN like a bad habit. If it wasn't for the US and Great Britain, that dumb organization wouldn't be around. We gave them their building, and almost all their money comes from the US and GB. Pretty soon, it'll be under the control of (excuse my French) crap countries that will place sanctions against us just to bring us down to their level. It's like the lower middle class in the US. They're jealous of the "rich," so rather than try to lift themselves up, they'd rather bring the successful people down.

[BADDOG]

I have to say you got make a good point there Dr Bullet, regarding the U.N. what exactly does it do but critisise those countrys that actually try to do some thing about the worlds trouble spots, mainly the U.S. and U.K.!

It does produce a lot of hot air however but not much in the way of tangible results!

Regards

[KU43]

but what can you do? one man stand? good way to get killed. organize? you be infiltrated before you get started.demand your constitutional rights? last time i tryed that the cop told me i had the right to shut the f@#K up and then ripped apart the inside of my truck. pulled me over for a license plate out. sure is funny thought, i re-wired them 2 days earler and they worked fine when i cheaked them after he had to let me go. the bill of rights is THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO SHUT THE F@#K UP. THE END

[Dr. Bullet]

That's when you run for office yourself

[SilentTrigger]

Originally posted by Dr. Bullet
We need to drop the UN like a bad habit. If it wasn't for the US and Great Britain, that dumb organization wouldn't be around. We gave them their building, and almost all their money comes from the US and GB. Pretty soon, it'll be under the control of (excuse my French) crap countries that will place sanctions against us just to bring us down to their level. It's like the lower middle class in the US. They're jealous of the "rich," so rather than try to lift themselves up, they'd rather bring the successful people down.

Last time i checked it was started by several, yes several and not two, countries. Namley: France, UK, USA, China, and former Soviet Union but not only

Seconly the one who can't see UN helping is born on the propaganda from the news agencies. Everytime UN doen't do anything theres a hell of a voice against them but there never seems to be a voice there when they do something of value. I do think there are things that could be better although, namley the veto system, it should be removed. But the problem with that is that some big "important" countries will feel as if their power is vanished. And i doubt they want that, thats what making it hard to change the structure.

And when scames are relived its UN that is bashed, even though its the persons invloved that are to blame rather then the whole organisation.


Saying "what exactly does it do but critisise those countrys that actually try to do some thing about the worlds trouble spots, mainly the U.S. and U.K.!" is just plain stupidity (sorry but i can't comeup with a better word for it. Ignorant is too week of a word in my opinion.

[Dr. Bullet]

I never said I liked the decisions our leaders made back then.

My problem with the UN is because of what, at its roots, in stands for, and that is control. Plain and simple. Do you know some of the measures that the UN countries are trying to push on the US? One is national legalized prostitution and legalized prostitution of young girls. One of its more notable supporters is Hillary Clinton.

I ask you this: what happens when this "world" organization decides that the US way of life just isn't good for us any more, and that action, military action, is necessary to change this? What happens when the jealous and greedy nations of the UN decide that countries like the US and GB that don't have their heads up their anal regions are bad for this world? Are you just going to go along with it?

The fact of the matter is, the UN will only work when it benefits everyone. No sane country would give a world power control over their own government...we saw this with Iraq's sanctions.

Also, I never said just the US and GB started the UN. What I said is they get the majority of their resources from us, including, but not limited to, finances and food. And it's a sh*tload of free food, lemme tell ya. And guess who gets the bill? Me and you matey. Personally, I don't care enough about a nation that throws the finger at us when we give them free food to keep on footing that bill. Seems to me, if Kim Jong Il is content to let his people die, and his people are content to keep up their crap about us, let them die. And that goes for every single other nation like that.

[Lakie]

.

[KU43]

The Leage of Nations failed and the UN has failed. It's leaders are thiefts. taking the food from the mouths of the starving. The UN has no backbone and that has been proven over and over again. to quote a Nevade Senator" the only reason for the UN is to destroy America." This country doesn't need the money hungry, liberials that do nothing except snivle about invading and taking out a mad man guilty of genoside. WHERE WOULD THE FRENCH BE IF THE US SET AROUND TRYING TO JUSTICFY NOT TAKING ON HITLER LET ALONE IGNORE EMBARRGOS AND TRADE WITH HIM! The truth is the UN need the USA and we need to "Drop the UN like a bad habit"

[Dr. Bullet]

The EU is, in my opinion, just another UN type thing. I hope and pray that Britain is not dumb enough to get into it. The pound is strong, but that would drop so fast it wouldn't be funny. GB would have the likes of Italy and France latching onto its economy, bringing Italy and France up and bringing GB down.

You make a great point about the EU economy. One thing that I am wholly disappointed with is the focus of this government on things like finding water and life on Mars. We're pouring billions into this, and yet my truck still only gets about 10-15 miles per gallon. New trucks today are lucky to get 24 mpg. But then we have people like Burt Routan making better ways to get into space...and a whole lot cheaper. My thinking is, fund a contest to make better energy that isn't reliant on oil. I would love nothing more than to throw the Middle East the finger and let them wallow in their oil, while what oil we do need comes from right here (literally in my state, Oklahoma).

Another thing, trade with China needs to be trade. They're becoming the super power they are off of the US. Our people whine about no more jobs, but in the same breath whine about high prices for goods. It's not the government's fault these companies are outsourcing, it's our own people in their drive to get cheap stuff.

I have many ideas that will topple many of our enemies. Elect me president, and no home will be without high speed internet (except the stupid people who don't deserve the internet). No gamer shall be without a gaming computer. And no more tree huggers!

It's getting late and my arguments are going way downhill. Talk to y'all later

[KU43]

. A federation of European States is not going to lay dormant.
just like it says in the Bible.

[KU43]

. A federation of European States is not going to lay dormant.
just like it says in the Bible.