Thread: point proven
View Single Post
  #6  
Old 03-15-2004, 03:40 PM
blueprint is offline blueprint
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 865

Send a message via ICQ to blueprint Send a message via AIM to blueprint
Quote:
Originally posted by Trilogy
everyone that replies to this thread please be careful..we are handing out warning points for flame.

Ha, I best just nor reply then huh.

THIS IS A COMMENT NOT A FLAME TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. IT'S WHAT I WOULD SAY TO ANYONE ELSE THAT MAKES A BAD SIG.

Text: would match the sig if it wasn't bevelled like that
Border: is pretty ugly, thick bright pink border? doesn't look good
Render: doesn't fit the pic/sig at all, it's not even a good render

I Hope you see what I'm getting at, sure, anyone could make a sig with a pic, anyone could also make a render with some prob, someone could follow a tut and make a background. Anyone can do anything, it's how stylish you make it that defines the difficulty of a sig.

I'd consider one of Spazz's sigs much better than some nooby c4d render with some text on it, big whoop you spent 3 huors rendering something, that doesn't take much skill at all either.

Just cause someone takes less time as you on their sigs doesn't mean they're worse then you, I'm just saying Spazz's sigs are much more stylish, timespean doesn't matter.


**NOT A FLAME >> I ALREADY HAVE ENOUGH WARNING POINTS

Reply With Quote