[animal_mutha]

guys guys guys..... bf1942 was fought during world war 2 & DF is more current. Try to draw a line there. Its a different sort of warfare between those 2. U dont see armies comes in waves such as the D-Day normandy landing today. U'll get napalm ****less. hehehehe...

if u like the large scale battles then BF1942 is the answer.... whereas DFBHD is more space limited...where terrain & teamwork plays a main role here. Not to say BF doesn't need teamwork though. I think u get what i mean here. But honestly, most of the time I played DF online, everybody seems to be a "RAMBO". 1 out 7 times will i meet a team operated gameplay nowadays. Stick the RAMBO gameplay in DM & TDM matches for god's sakes. I hate it went there's no teamwork in A&D CTF TKOTH maps. Those are my favourite kinda map.

When it comes to realism... i would say the ghost recon series or any other Tom Clancy's series. When I said realism... I'm talking about the amount of "brain" power on completing a mission. Of coz u dont jump around like a jack-ass to avoid bullets in BF or DF. But when it comes to fun BF1942 has my vote, though laggy sometimes. For realism I'd go for ghost recon. And to strike a balance between those 2 i would go for DFBHD. And DFBHD is still my favourite game tough.

Hey... I used to play Operation Flashpoint before this. I love the "COLD-WAR" missions. If only they have the same engine as DFBHD or Wolfenstein's.

Whatabout vietnam war? u guys played "viet-cong" yet? I'm looking forward for "VIETNAM: Men of Valour", coming from the magnificent team that bought us Medal of Honour.

God.... I could go on & on.... hehehhe better stop yapping now