View Single Post
  #35  
Old 12-06-2004, 07:00 PM
Dr. Bullet is offline Dr. Bullet

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,655

I never said I liked the decisions our leaders made back then.

My problem with the UN is because of what, at its roots, in stands for, and that is control. Plain and simple. Do you know some of the measures that the UN countries are trying to push on the US? One is national legalized prostitution and legalized prostitution of young girls. One of its more notable supporters is Hillary Clinton.

I ask you this: what happens when this "world" organization decides that the US way of life just isn't good for us any more, and that action, military action, is necessary to change this? What happens when the jealous and greedy nations of the UN decide that countries like the US and GB that don't have their heads up their anal regions are bad for this world? Are you just going to go along with it?

The fact of the matter is, the UN will only work when it benefits everyone. No sane country would give a world power control over their own government...we saw this with Iraq's sanctions.

Also, I never said just the US and GB started the UN. What I said is they get the majority of their resources from us, including, but not limited to, finances and food. And it's a sh*tload of free food, lemme tell ya. And guess who gets the bill? Me and you matey. Personally, I don't care enough about a nation that throws the finger at us when we give them free food to keep on footing that bill. Seems to me, if Kim Jong Il is content to let his people die, and his people are content to keep up their crap about us, let them die. And that goes for every single other nation like that.
__________________
Reply With Quote