Novahq.net Forum

Novahq.net Forum (https://novahq.net/forum/index.php)
-   Tech Support (https://novahq.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   3dmark2000 scores (https://novahq.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1073)

Steve 01-12-2002 05:58 PM

3dmark2000 scores
 
hi im sure some of u know about the 3dmark2000 and 2001 tests by madonion.com

well anyway i ran the test today and my score was:

4783

nothing spectacular i know but my graphics card isnt very good.
i'd liek to see what scores other ppl her can get. if u need a link to the site to d/l the test just ask.

im going to tweak and overclock to see how good i can make it.

Sandman 01-13-2002 02:44 AM

Check me if I'm wrong, but that file said it was 38mB in size? Did you d/l it or buy it from them? And just what exactly will it tell me other than buy one of thier cards because mine isn't good enough? Just wondering.

Steve 01-13-2002 05:17 AM

could well be pretty big sorry, it came on a magazine cover.

madonion dont sell anything apart from the proversion of the software on thrir site and basically just system testing software.

i think the site is for overclocking enthusiasts to see how fast you can get your computer running. just a bit of fun really.

you get ur result then you can compaire it to the thousands of ppl who have the same graphics card or processor to see if ur computer can run faster. if ur score is well down then you can get advice on how to make it better.

the reason i chose 3dmark200o over 2001 is because 2001 is designed to test cards that use directx8 features such as GeForce 3 and Radeon 8500 ( only card that uses DX8.1 features;) ). whereas 2000 tests DirextX7, which is what "the rest of us have" lol.

zza1pqx 01-15-2002 08:01 PM

What settings did you use.?

I got a lot less than that at 1024x768 32 bit but I have a lesser Mboard and memory than you and Ive underclocked my card to reduce the crashes i been getting.

What settings you benchmarking at?

Steve 01-16-2002 03:22 AM

benchmarked at default settings. ur not using 2001 r u? that will half ur score.

its more than quadroupled my score from my duron 700 / tnt2 m64

however using winxp will slow u up to i think ( believe it or not ).

my gcard is a hercules 4500 64MB with Kyro2 chipset.

Sandman 01-16-2002 07:34 PM

I give up. I must be seeing something different at that site! Do you have a link to the test ???

Steve 01-17-2002 12:22 PM

sorry m8, woulda posted it forst time but i was @ work:D

http://gamershq.madonion.com

the d/l is 19MB i think the 2001 is 34 MB


i just got a new score

4783 > 4915

Steve 01-19-2002 01:21 PM

1400 @ 1507 Ghz

= 5034 points:)

die_4_me 01-19-2002 01:56 PM

6098

=D

MUAHAHAHAHAH

and i have it at 800x600x32!!!

Sandman 01-20-2002 02:28 AM

-10???

Steve 01-20-2002 07:44 AM

Quote:

-10???
??

die 4, run it @ 1000x700 cause u cant compaire otherwise

JAB 01-20-2002 09:13 PM

7127:~) ;) :D

zza1pqx 01-21-2002 09:36 AM

Damn.
I need a new PC

Sandman 01-22-2002 07:41 PM

Ok, all BS aside. I D/L the test thing and ran it. I came up with a score of 971. Is this even close to being right??? It wouldn't do some of the tests! said the hardware is not supported. Here's a screenie of my results[IMG]C:\windows\desktop\test1.jpg[/IMG]
Is this even correct? And if you want to make this an icon please feel free. I can't figure it all out! The card is an ATI Rage Fury Pro 32mB AGP tested at a resolution of 1028x768-32.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®