Which is better??
 

Can I just ask you all to give me input whether i should keep this sig as is ........or should i put more in it like i put the face in the second one .........any info would b great.......I kinda think its missing something but cant put my finger on it, thx.:gj:
SIGS BELOW
http://sigs.hqhosting.net/spydaman1.gif

http://sigs.hqhosting.net/spydaman2.gif

I Think the top one looks the best m8.
The face looks out of place on the other.

Nice Work!

top

can anyone else not see a difference?

Thx
 

:gj:

Yeah, whole lotta choices in that one huh? I gotta go with Short on this. I see no difference at all. Everyone that said "oh yeah, the top one for sure" must not have bothered letting the bottom one load.

look at top left, kinda ghost like face.

top

Yeah, thanks DB. My buddy Madd pointed that out just before you did. But still, to me it's not enough of a difference to matter. They both look dandy as far as my non-sig-making-ass can tell.

Re: Which is better??
 

if the whole of the b/g was covered in faces like that then it would look very nice

thx
 

yeah i guess i couldve put more on it so people would know what i was talking about but for those of you that did see the face in the second one .....thx for lookin harder i guess lol.......but u might b right stevie putting alot of those faces accross the whole background might work.......i'll have to look at it and see ........thx for the input fellas.

well its not the whole bg but how bout this stevie ........ lol just playin around with it .........bored i guess lol ........thx to stevie for info.
http://sigs.hqhosting.net/spydaman3.gif

hehe pretty cool m8 :)

i have a suggestion, on the tiger layer, go to edit > brightness/conterast and slide the contrast up a little. see whow that comes out :)

cool thx m8
 

Yes the contrast did bring the tiger out better didnt it.......thx m8:gj:

http://sigs.hqhosting.net/spydaman3.gif

:gj: