Which is better??
Can I just ask you all to give me input whether i should keep this sig as is ........or should i put more in it like i put the face in the second one .........any info would b great.......I kinda think its missing something but cant put my finger on it, thx.:gj:
SIGS BELOW http://sigs.hqhosting.net/spydaman1.gif http://sigs.hqhosting.net/spydaman2.gif |
I Think the top one looks the best m8.
The face looks out of place on the other. Nice Work! |
top
|
can anyone else not see a difference?
|
Thx
:gj:
|
Quote:
|
look at top left, kinda ghost like face.
top |
Yeah, thanks DB. My buddy Madd pointed that out just before you did. But still, to me it's not enough of a difference to matter. They both look dandy as far as my non-sig-making-ass can tell.
|
Re: Which is better??
Quote:
if the whole of the b/g was covered in faces like that then it would look very nice |
thx
yeah i guess i couldve put more on it so people would know what i was talking about but for those of you that did see the face in the second one .....thx for lookin harder i guess lol.......but u might b right stevie putting alot of those faces accross the whole background might work.......i'll have to look at it and see ........thx for the input fellas.
|
well its not the whole bg but how bout this stevie ........ lol just playin around with it .........bored i guess lol ........thx to stevie for info.
http://sigs.hqhosting.net/spydaman3.gif |
hehe pretty cool m8 :)
i have a suggestion, on the tiger layer, go to edit > brightness/conterast and slide the contrast up a little. see whow that comes out :) |
cool thx m8
Yes the contrast did bring the tiger out better didnt it.......thx m8:gj:
http://sigs.hqhosting.net/spydaman3.gif |
:gj:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®